Sunday, April 17, 2011

Split in Israeli-Georgian Relations and activities of Global CST in Abkhazia?

"Split" in Israeli-Georgian relations and the activities of Global CST in Abkhazia?

Joni Simonishvili

http://www.voltairenet.org/article168736.html

I would have said it different, "riding with the fox and running with the hounds."

http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=23348

 Abkhaz news agency, Apsnipress, reported that “the seven-member Israeli delegation”, led by Ziv, also includes Meir Klifi, CEO of Global CST, who was Israeli PM Binyamin Netanyahu’s military aide until 2009. Israel Ziv, retired major general and a former head of operations at the Israeli General Staff, met with the breakaway region’s prime minister Sergey Shamba.

“Issues related with cooperation in the fields of security, tourism and agriculture were discussed,” Apsnipress news agency reported.

Beyond security and defense consultancy and trainings the Global CST also has a civil division offering strategies in various fields ranging from agriculture to communication and infrastructure.

Global CST was involved in training of the Georgian troops, but the company, along with another Israeli security firm, Defense Shield, reportedly wrapped up their operations in Georgia shortly before the August, 2008 invasion of South Ossetia by Georgia.

NB - is not Global CST the company who Gaddafi hired his 50,000 mercenaries through.  Something interesting is going on here, and it has more to do with a bigger regional game than protecting innocent civilians.

Russian President Medvedev recently met with Jacob Zuma (South African premier) to discuss ways (along with China) of resolving the conflict in Libya. It seems like Israel might have got bored with all their old friends and are forging new alliances with countries whose economies and political systems aren't in complete tatters. I am loving every minute of this horse and poney show.

Don’t get the Jews upset – to fight the Jews is to fight G-d's will.
-
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Spanish Cluster bombs dropped on Libya

Show me the evidence?

The Libyans have told them to bring on the evidence. Spanish cluster bombs with a batch number - you reckon the CIA has stockpiles of cluster bombs from various manufacturers which they just throw on the ground when it suits them?

The BBC is currently getting slaughtered in the comments to all their stories they publish on their web site. They're no different to Rustavi 2. Nothing is mentioned the story about how disgraceful it is that an EU country actually made these things in the first place. Why such double standards?

No kidding - probably 95% of the comments on the last two Libya stories I've seen on the BBC have been hyper-critical of the coalition... and quite supportive of Gaddafi.

This cluster bomb story is almost too predictable. I think it originated in the NYT - not HRW. Funny, when you Google MAT-120 cluster bomb (no Libya) the results are filled with this story that Libya has used them, and the story is less than 24 hours old. I find that a little suspicious in itself.

What do you know about the source of cluster bombs for Kadafi, and I wonder if there are M-85, the same kind as sold to Georgia in bulk, now that would be an interesting nexus!!!

Here is what someone just sent to share:

"HRW is a fake human rights organization that has played dirty Pentagon politics for a long time. It was formed [by the same people in NED] to defame and discredit the Soviets during the Cold War, but not point at USA or its allies.

They are now blasting the media with hearsay of cluster bombs used by Kaddafi, which are verified by two unnamed local Libyan respondents. I wish you would try to put on their comments the cluster bomb stories you have about Gori and see how rights oriented they really are, and not just jerk off lying politics."

There are only a few sources of Libyan cluster bombs, and the manufacturers of them are not into human rights, especially those that manufacture m-85s. Most wars are started by telling flat out lies so many times that they become truth; there are few sources of cluster bombs, Georgia and Israel have plenty and can get more.
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web

Cluster Bombs in Libya may be the ULTIMATE SCAM

Cluster Bombs in Libya may be ultimate scam

Why are there double standards? The old saying that “what is good for the goose is good for the gander” does not always apply, especially when it applies to US policy as who is trustworthy to arm to the teeth or not.  One can be a friend today and an enemy tomorrow, and even be hanged. Need to look to Israel and Georgia as the source of the cluster bombs, all this is fairly well documented - and merits closer investigation into high level arms trafficking. They are now blasting the media with hearsay of cluster bombs used by Kaddafi, which are verified by two unnamed local Libyan people with NED “tainted” clustered eyes. You don't need airplanes to drop cluster bombs on innocents, as proved in Georgia during the Russian-Georigan war of 2008.

There are only a few sources of Libyan cluster bombs, and the manufacturers of them are not into human rights, especially those that manufacture m-85s. Most wars are started by telling the lie so many times that it becomes truth. There are few sources of cluster bombs, Georgia and Israel have plenty and can get more.
As one of the readers wrote today, all that Joni Simonishvili has to do is make a quick FRIEND REQUEST and then you can post the other 400 or so posts already there on HRW.You have a responsibility to prevent a war in Libya.  You are the man!
They should accept you as a friend in less than a few hours.You might even stop a useless war Joni, in Libya, and save millions of lives and trillions in money wasted along with the lives.....

Unfortunately, I can only post in comments, which I have already done - as only Human Rights can post to the wall - and I posted on the Israeli sister site and it took the information; they understand what is being exported from Israel, drones too, and the many layers of dirty links to the international weapons trade.  

It has been suggested to post my HR Georgia cluster bomb piece on HRW Facebook, and also inside “deep knowledge” of Kaddafy's purchases also; the timing is perfect.  I am told whole world is now watching this Facebook of HRW due to massive news coverage of alleged Kaddafy cluster bombs, in the western Atlantic Council and NED controlled media.

Yes, there is a nexus to Georgia and the wholesale use and re-export of cluster bombs and that is no state secret, fortunately many of the M85 Israeli bombs proved to be duds when used on Georgian soldiers and civilians back in August of 2008. It would be more interesting however to understand the full mechanism of how lots of non-documented hardware comes first to Georgia and then is re-exported, and why John Bass was appointed as US Ambassador to Georgia, and all his shady connections to KBR and sleazy defense contractors.
Much is involved, and while everybody talks about Kaddafy and Cluster or how Russia is a big player in the arms export policy, as in US Embassy Cables and exports to Syria and Iran are part of a broader strategy of distinguishing Russian policy from that of the United States, and strengthening Russian influence. The truth of the matter is the US is really the largest exporter, “merchant of death” – and allows it closest allies to be the go between on covert arms deals.
Russia does not disturb growing Israeli-Russian diplomatic engagement, and wants to keep “special” relations with Damascus. Likewise, arms sales to Iran are part of a deep and multilayered bilateral relationship that serves to distinguish Moscow from Washington, and to provide Russian officials with a bargaining chip, both with the Ahmedinejad regime and its P5 1 partners. It is interesting how these weapons come via of Georgia in broad day, and under escort by the Georgian Ministry of Internal Affairs.  
While, as a matter of practice, Russian arms sales have declined as international frustration has mounted over the Iranian regime, and as a matter of policy, Russia does not support what it perceives as U.S. efforts to build an anti-Iranian coalition. However, that does not hold the Georgia’s back, and it is business as usual – and even better than ever.
As the US Embassy writes “while profit is still seen by experts as Russia’s primary goal, all note the secondary thrill of causing the U.S. discomfort by selling weapons to anti-American governments in Caracas and Damascus.” The real arms dealers work via Georgia, supply weapons to Africa all under the cover of bogus end user certificates generated by US allies, such as Jordan – flogging off Serbian weapons to hotspots all around the world – and those same weapons are killing Americans soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, and not to mention civilians and government forces in Libya. American defense contractors are laughing all the way to the bank.
One does not have to dig much to understand Georgia’s role in weapons trafficking and the bigger role of the United States. There is no coincidence that John Bass was appointed based on his close connections with KBR, Halliburton and Black Water, not to mention on a local level such companies as CUBIC a) and ARCHANGEL b), two American Defence Contractors working in Georgia and the region. The recriminations are impression and the finger pointing,

Given Russia’s and [America’s] [US via NATO] competing interest in expanding sales to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, the protests of our moderate Arab partners could also carry a price tag for Russian defiance. The same is true for Latin America, whose leaders to date have not made sales to Chavez an issue on their bilateral agenda with the Russians.”
The appearance of Russian weapons in Iraq, presumably transferred by Syria, and the prospect of American and coalition casualties as a result could change the calculus of Russian sales to Damascus. The more evidence that we can provide, the more Russia may take steps to restrict the Asad regime. At the same time, we need to be prepared for the Russian countercharge that significant numbers of weapons delivered by the U.S. have fallen into insurgent hands.
Anyone interested in this needs only to contact the following:
Also, you may want to talk to the Embassy of the Federal Republic of German, Christian Farkhondeh, Military Attache, and Wolfgang Richter, Senior Military Advisor, Permanent Mission of the Federal Republic of Germany to the OSCE in Vienna.

Wolfgang Richter, Colonel, Senior Military Advisor, Permanent Mission of OSCE
Christian Farkhondeh, Lieutenant Colonel (GS) German Embassy, Tbilisi

It is very interesting that German companies are part of the paperwork for some of the arms flowing via Georgia, and it is debatable if this is legal or not.

Talk to the human rights centre, www.humanrights.ge about this, and what was the reaction when they first started investigating this possibility.

The pattern shows that Georgia is basically a failed mafia state getting rich off illegal trafficking of weapons and can be considered as a state sponsor of terrorism.

It is claimed by US policy makers that “providing the Russians with better releasable intelligence when arguing against weapons transfers to “rogue states” is essential and [America’s] Russian interlocutors are not always impressed by the evidence we use to prove that their arms are ending up in the wrong hands. While we doubt Russia will terminate all its problematic sales for the reasons described above, more compelling evidence could lead the GOR to reduce the scope of its arms transfers or tighten export controls.
I think in the final analysis, it is the other way around, not where Russian arms sales end up but where the bulk of American arms end up – and this includes those being “grad” systems launched on innocents around the world, and especially Georgia and Libya.
You don’t need airplanes to drop cluster bombs on innocents and make weapons dealers rich.
-
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and                           love email again

Friday, April 15, 2011

Will Georgia be a member of NATO while Saakashvili is president?

"Georgia may never be in NATO because of Saakashvili who is perceived by the international community as "reckless".....

When all is said and done, however, Saakahvili as a president still does handle himself in most instances, but he's still a reckless liability; many in the international community consider him as being a loose cannon, not a trustworty parnter and will cut and run when the thick of batter. Can the  West afford WWIII as a result of Georgia's NATO membership aspirations as long as Saakashvilli holds the top position as a one man show and wants to focus attention on himself?

That pretty much tells why Georgia will not be a member of NATO anytime soon.

Here is an article from 2008

Will Georgia's government pay a heavy price for a serious error of judgment?

Jeffrey K. Silverman

In a HARD TALK interview broadcast on 18 September 2008, Stephen Sackur of the BBC talked to Mikhail Saakashvili, the President of Georgia. Last month's conflict over South Ossetia was a defining moment in relations between Russia, Georgia and the West. Although both sides have agreed to a ceasefire, the long term prospects for stability in that corner of the Caucasus still looks bleak.

Many in the international community and those in Georgia who know English were able to witness Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili live on BBC battling it out with Steven Sackur on HARD TALK.  It was clear that this was not an even match and Sackur bloodied the Georgian president without even dirtying his hands.  It appears as if Saakashvili leaped right into every one of Sackur's debate traps; it was delicious to see the unrehearsed debate and surgical recriminations.

Saakashvili may indeed know 4 languages well enough but when "push comes to shove" in a verbal match he parrots all his propaganda to stall for time to think, he said over and over repetitively the same line as are written in many of the Georgian English language newspapers and US Embassy press releases, "beacon of democracy", "economic boom" of Georgia, and the president even said that Georgia was "prosperous".

Tell that to many socially disadvantaged and poor people in Georgia, not to mention IDPs, who have seen inflation and price gouging at its worst in the last few years. Their pensions and meager earnings have been eaten away at an unprecedented level. What is sad is that enough money could have been in the budget for making Georgia and its citizens actually prosperous. However, a very large chunk of revenues was gobbled up by the out of control military budget.

Saakashvili stepped way over the line a dozen times in half an hour during the BBC program and came across to many as a dangerous and reckless maniac.  Some viewers will wonder if all Georgians are so wacky, preposterous, and so very dangerous. However, we can't blame Saakashvili for his professional level of English - he was only in America about four months after all (not that they speak English there!) - The trouble is, as long as Saakashvili is regarded as the legal President he will be supported, as there are no grounds for supporting anyone else. An awful lot of people all over the world would have to admit to a lot of mistakes (and worse) before they faced reality, but a Third World War (which will happen) will force everyone to start again.

It may be too early to predict that president-elect has no future - it is just a question of who he takes down with him. His fellow travelers all fancy replacing him, because they still think that they have a future. Some would take exception and say that they are all as much misguided and delusional as he is! Why should Georgia have to put up with this?

As Aage Borchgevink, from the Norwegian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights shares "... the mirage of President Mikheil Saakashvili as a Western-oriented reformer, and the strategic aim of strengthening ties between Georgia and NATO, tends to result in favorable assessment of Georgian democracy by Western leaders.

The Georgian opposition, on the other hand, portrays Saakashvli as a telegenic Lavrentiy Beria. However, even in polarized Georgia there remain independent monitors, like the Georgian Public Defender. Their version of Georgia is a country going in an authoritarian direction. Based on what Georgia does (and not on what it says), it seems that the Western and democratic orientation of the regime is superficial at best.

The Georgian government has made numerous business deals with Russian and Kazakh companies, and could probably establish new strategic alliances in order to protect its interests, the principle of which seems to be maintaining power. Myopic focus of supporting Saakashvili at the expense of an honest look at Georgia's human rights record, may lead to the Western states' discrediting the concept of democracy and antagonizing the Georgian population."

Watch this program yourself, provided the link will not be blocked, and you be the judge. I've also seen him on the BBC's "Have Your Say" program before - which in my opinion was an embarrassing performance where he wouldn't shut up. It is as if he likes the sound of his own voice - and thinks that, just because he can speak reasonably fluent English everyone will be on his side. But he just speaks like a Georgian using the English language.

Saakashvili made BIG MISTAKES and called Steven Sackur "a dirty Putin" and he was very angry when Sackur asked him if he will let Nino Burjanadze, former speaker of the Georgian Parliament, conduct a full investigation into the "real" events leading up to rockets being fired into Tskhinvali (South Ossetia).

Georgia may never be in NATO because of Saakashvili who is perceived by the international community as being"reckless".....

When all is said and done, however, Saakahvili as a president still does handle himself in most instances, but he's still a reckless liability to many; more than a few of those working in the international community consider him as being a loose cannon. Can we afford WWIII with Georgia's NATO membership aspirations as long as Saakashvilli holds the top position as a one man show?

Jeffrey Silverman, Freelance American Journalist and resident of Georgia for most part of 17 years.

N.B. One of our readers has sent the above article to our address. He writes that he discovered it in the Internet and addressed it to our editorial office along with his note which reads:

'I'd like to know factually whose payroll is Jeffrey Silverman, alleged 'freelance American journalist and resident of Georgia for most part of 17 years'?

The note of our reader is signed by:

Uime Raari, Freelance Abkhazian Journalist of Finnish origin, resident of Georgia for 'entire part of' 35 years.

P.S. True to our policy, Georgian Journal, we publish letters of Messers Silverman and Raari without applying any corrections.

-- http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software                           or over the web

Thursday, April 14, 2011

More Fuchs fallout? Georgian Business Climate

More Fuchs fallout? Georgian Business Climate

A founder and owner of Israeli security consultancy firm, Global CST, Israel Ziv, is in Sokhumi meeting with the breakaway region's leadership on April 14, Abkhaz and Russian news agencies are reporting. Beyond security and defense consultancy and trainings the Global CST also has a civil division offering strategies in various fields ranging from agriculture to communication and infrastructure.

Note - Global CST are the company who Gaddafi hired his 50,000 mercenaries through.  Yesterday Medvedev met with Jacob Zuma (South African premier) to discuss ways (along with China) of resolving the conflict in Libya. It seems like Israel might have got bored with all their old friends and are forging new alliances with countries whose economies and political systems aren't in complete tatters.

Don’t get the Jews upset – to fight the Jews is to fight God.
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail

Monday, April 11, 2011

Blood for Oil, BTC, Lies and Subterfuge!

LET’S NOT FALL FOR GOVERNMENTAL SUBERFUGE AND LIES!

People should support all those in the Middle East who are fighting for democracy;  for that reason, let’s oppose U.S. government intervention of any kind in these countries--whether it’s money to manipulate and hijack people’s struggles, interference by the CIA, or deadly force.  Everyone should oppose the U.S./NATO war on Libya, and fight for  the right to decide  issues of war and peace, how to use our taxes, etc.

We  know that the  government shamelessly lies to cover up its real motives. The government launched a war against Iraq with massive bombing --using the cover of a “search for weapons of mass destruction.”  Now Obama  presents U.S. aggression against Libya as a “humanitarian mission of mercy.” But people around the world are condemning the U.S.-led war as another case of “blood for oil” for the big corporations and for a new strategically located Mediterranean military base.

Now we learn about secrets the U.S. and its NATO allies have kept from us. According to the New York Times (3/31)-- (1)  CIA agents are on the ground in Libya, communicating with the Libyan opposition, (2) Obama signed a secret Presidential Order authorizing the CIA to provide weapons to the Libyan opposition, (3) dozens of British Special Forces and MI6 officers have been operating inside Libya for weeks. An interview on National Public Radio (4/2) indicates that the civil war in Libya did not start this year.  Khalifa Hafter, now a leader of the opposition, failed in the 1980’s to overthrow the Libyan government from a base in Chad. He then fled to the U.S.  After 25 years of living  just 7 miles from CIA headquarters, he’s back in Libya.  In the 90’s while in the U.S. he created the “Libyan National Army” which operated in eastern Libya.  Other facts are coming out,  indicating that the U.S. has for some time had its agents working to destabilize Libya.

U.S.-led aggression against a sovereign nation violates the UN Charter, which is international law signed by the U.S.  The Charter says  no country has the right to attack another country unless that country has attacked it. It also says no country has the right to intervene in a civil war as is happening in Libya.

The government has somehow found money to attack Libya.  At the same time,  it’s crying “budget crisis” across the country and demanding that workers take cuts in pay, insurance, pensions, accept mass layoffs and give up their right to collective bargaining.  Everyone is threatened with cuts in education, unemployment compensation, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.  The solution:  stop funding war.

For Libyans and all the people of the Middle East who don’t want to suffer under control of the U.S. Empire the solution is-- U.S. Out Now-- Tomahawk missiles, bases, CIA,  or expert advisers to help set up new governments.  The U.S. is the cause of-- not the solution for-- humanitarian crises. Just look at the humanitarian crisis in Palestine where the U.S. pays $3.5 billion yearly for bombings and ruthless occupation -- and then blocks the UN from condemning Israel, its client state. Libyans have a right to decide their own future-- free of all foreign interference by  powerful countries who have criminal agendas.

This leaflet is from the M19 Anti-War Coalition, M19AWC@gmail.com, 773.250.3335
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...

William Dunbar but how ended up working for Iranian TV?

William Dunbar called a dweeb for NED by some......latest update; I am totally confused, I thought he liked Georgia and Georgians!!!

RT, a round-the-clock English-language news channel, started broadcasting on 10 December 2005 and is available worldwide via satellite. The TV station is funded by the state owned RIA-Novosti News agency. By its own account RT regularly airs news as well as “many aspects of Russian history, cultureand opinions. Our special projects are specifically tailored to accustom the international audience with the Russian perspective.” In general it is steering clear of criticism of the President and the government, and the Russian opposition is not given a platform to air its views. (See also  ESI  picture story Mainstream views on Russian TV)

During the 2008 Caucasus War, William Dunbar, a journalist at Russia Today, resigned from RT after criticizing the channel’s pro-Russian bias.He told the Moscow Times that a series of video satellite feeds that he had scheduled for 11 August had been scrapped because they reported the Russian bombing of targets inside Georgia. “The real news, the real facts of the matter, didn’t conform to what theywere trying to report, and therefore, they wouldn’t let me report it. I felt that I had no choice but to resign”, Dunbar was quoted as saying. One senior journalist at Russia Today called Dunbar’s allegations of bias “nonsense”. “The Russian coverage I have seen has been much better than much WILLIAM DUNBAR, called a dweeb for NED by some......latest update

RT, a round-the-clock English-language news channel, started broadcasting on 10 December 2005  and is available worldwide via satellite. The TV station is funded  by the state owned RIA-Novosti  news agency. By its own account RT regularly airs news as well as “many aspects of Russian history, culture and opinions. Our special projects are specifically tailored to accustom the international  audience with the Russian perspective.” In general it is steering clear of criticism of the President and the government, and the Russian opposition is not given a platform to air its views. (See also  ESI  picture story Mainstream views on Russian TV)/ During the 2008 Caucasus War, William Dunbar, a journalist at Russia Today, resigned from RT after  criticizing the channel’s pro-Russian bias. He told the Moscow Times that a series of video satellite  feeds that he had scheduled for 11 August had been scrapped because they reported the Russian  bombing of targets inside Georgia. “The real news, the real facts of the matter, didn’t conform to what they were trying to report, and therefore, they wouldn’t let me report it. I felt that I had no choice but to resign”, Dunbar was quoted as saying. One senior journalist at Russia Today called Dunbar’s  allegations of bias “nonsense”. “The Russian coverage I have seen has been much better than much of the Western coverage,” he said. “My view is that Russia Today is not particularly biased at all. When  you look at the Western media, there is a lot of genuflection towards the powers that be. Russian news coverage is largely pro-Russia, but that is to be expected.” http://www.pri.org/theworld/?q=node/20092 (an interview with William Dunbar)

According to RT’s website the channel set up a bureau in Tskhinvali, the capital of South Ossetia, after the August 2008 conflict the Western coverage,” he said. “My view is that Russia Today is not particularly biased at all. When you look at the Western media, there is a lot of genuflection towards the powers that be. Russian news coverage is largely pro-Russia, but that is to be expected.”http://www.pri.org/theworld/?q=node/20092  (an interview with William Dunbar)According to RT’s website the channel set up a bureau in Tskhinvali, the capital of South Ossetia, after the August 2008 conflict.
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free